🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial policy to ban social networking access for young people below 16 is creating waves worldwide. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and guardians are watching closely to see if this approach will set a precedent for other nations.

Across Europe Trend

In Europe, a rising group of states are moving toward parallel measures.

• Denmark has announced a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the leader stating that smartphones and networks are "taking away our youngsters' youth". Legislation may be formalized soon.
• Norway is set to implement a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to protect children from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is working on a digital wallet to confirm the identity and age of social media account holders. Authorities have indicated that an similar ban could be "a potential tools on the table".
• In Spain, the president has urged lawmakers to approve a proposal increasing the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has recommended a comparable action, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Netherlands has recommended guardians to block their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has passed a advisory motion calling for a ban for under-16s except if a parent decides otherwise is provided. Although it highlights of the "habit-forming" design of these platforms, the step does not enact mandatory rules.

"A clear age restriction is a useful first step," commented the parliamentarian supporting the initiative.

The UK: A Cautious Stance

In the UK, the administration has remained open to a future ban, arguing that "no option is being dismissed" but insisting any decision must be "supported by conclusive research".

Previously, momentum gathered behind a proposal to impose limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually watered down. Instead, the government pledged to conduct more studies the matter.

Campaign organizations have raised apprehensions. An organization set up by the family of a teenager who was lost after viewing disturbing platform posts argues that a strict age ban might not improve online safety and could result in a "dangerous transition" of risk when users turn 16.

"This ban is a response to the inability of the tech sector to build platforms and apps that are appropriate and age appropriate for minors," said a leading peer.

The US: A Fragmented Landscape

In the United States, action is mostly occurring at the local level amid national inaction.

• Utah demands parental consent for minors to use social media and limits late-night use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a bill barring those below 14 from joining social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a law capping under-16s to a single hour of social media access per day, with any further access requiring a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly enacted laws mandating adult authorization for under-16s to create social media presences.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from some figures to follow Australia's path, a federal ban is currently seen as improbable.

Global Views

Apart from Europe and the US, additional states are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to ban social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the required age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, global organizations take a more cautious stance. A major UN agency has advised that age-based restrictions have downsides and "may even backfire". The body notes that social networks can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable children and that government action should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to invest in child safeguards.

While this worldwide debate continues, the steps of Australia and several other countries indicate that policymakers around the world are increasingly prepared to delay for tech companies to make changes on their own.